ASSEMBLY BILL 361 (HARRIS – 1987)
CHAPTER 86, STATUTES OF 1987
Some bill research does not include the Governor's file because at the time we researched the bill, the sitting Governor had not released his chaptered bill file. If the Governor's file is not included with this particular research, please contact our office (1-800-666-1917 or email@example.com) and we will be happy to provide this file at no charge if it is available.
As enacted in 1987, Assembly Bill 361 amended numerous sections in the Code of Civil Procedure relating to discovery. (See Exhibit #1g) Assembly member Elihu M. Harris introduced this bill on January 22, 1987 as a clean-up measure to Assembly Bill 169 and Assembly Bill 1334 of 1986. (See Exhibits #1a and #6a, page 3) The changes proposed by Assembly Bill 361 were the result of meetings between representatives of the Discovery Commission, the Judicial Council, the State Bar of California, the California Defense Counsel, the California Trial Lawyers’ Association, the California Medical Association, and the insurance industry. (See Exhibit #6a, page 3)
While before the Legislature, Assembly Bill 361 was heard by the Assembly and Senate Committees on Judiciary. (See Exhibits #3 and #6) Assembly Bill 361 was amended once in the Assembly and three times in the Senate. (See Exhibits #1b through #1e and #2) After passage by both of these Committees, and the Legislature as a whole, the measure was forwarded to the Governor for his signature on June 25, 1987. On June 30, 1987, however, the action of sending the bill to the Governor was rescinded and the bill was returned to the Assembly and amended. (See Exhibits #1f and #2) The Assembly, on July 1, 1987, again concurred in the Senate’s amendments and forwarded the measure to Governor George Deukmejian who signed it on that date. (See Exhibits #1g, #2, and #15) Assembly Bill 361 was recorded by the Secretary of State on July 2, 1987 as Chapter 86 of the Statutes of 1987. (See Exhibits #1g and #2)
Assembly Bill 361 was an urgency bill going into immediate effect. Section 22 of the bill notes the necessity for the urgency as follows:
In order that necessary revisions to Article 3 (commencing with Section 2016) of Chapter 3 of Title 3 of Part 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure (the Civil Discovery Act of 1986) may take effect prior to that act’s operative date, and to make related changes, it is necessary for this act to take effect immediately.
(See Exhibit #1g, pages 61 and 62)