Assembly Bill 3312 (Wright-1988)
Chapter 890, Statutes of 1988
Some bill research does not include the Governor's file because at the time we researched the bill, the sitting Governor had not released his chaptered bill file. If the Governor's file is not included with this particular research, please contact our office (1-800-666-1917 or firstname.lastname@example.org) and we will be happy to provide this file at no charge if it is available.
Assembly member Cathie Wright wrote to the Governor on August 26, 1988 to request his signature on Assembly Bill 3312. In this letter, the following summary of the bill was provided:
This bill would specify that in any action for dissolution of marriage under the Family Law Act, the court may sever and grant an early and separate trial on the issue of the dissolution of the status of the marriage, apart from other issues. The bill would authorize the court to impose conditions on the grant of the severance, as specified. The bill would also require a judgment granting a dissolution of the status of the marriage to expressly reserve jurisdiction for later determination of all other pending issues.
This bill is sponsored by the Bar Association of San Francisco and the Conference of Delegates of the State Bar of California. It is necessary to provide uniformity in the law, and to preserve the property rights of the parties to a dissolution, while allowing early dissolution of the status of the marriage so that the parties can continue on with their lives.
(See Exhibit #11, document PE-2)
The background information and the need for the legislation is set forth in the analysis of Assembly Bill 3312 as amended on March 24, 1988 prepared for the Assembly Committee on Judiciary. (See Exhibit #3a) The analysis contains the following comment attributed to the sponsor of the measure, the State Bar of California:
Case law provides persuasive authority for the court to grant a bifurcation of the partiesĺ marital status prior to a resolution of any other pending issues. Currently, motions for such relief are made pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1048(b) which does
not address any problems and concerns which often arise only in family law courts when such orders are requested. This bill expressly embodies case law precedent on the benefits of this
procedure and, while doing so, provides a remedy for the most frequently voiced objections to such order in the form of the proposed conditions precedent.
(See Exhibit #3a, page 1)
The complete Legislative History Report and Analysis and documents with authenticating declaration expands upon the information above. In addition to available legislative file materials from the Assembly and Senate Committees, the author and the Governor, our research typically includes review for competitor and predecessor bills, interim reports, hearings, studies and other relevant background documentation unique to this legislation. To order a complete report, please contact us by e-mail at email@example.com, by faxing your request to (530) 668 5866, or by calling us toll free at 1-800-666-1917.